Manifesto in defense of the MST

22/09/2009
  • Español
  • English
  • Français
  • Deutsch
  • Português
  • Opinión
-A +A
“...They become legitimate not through their property but through their work, in this world in which work is becoming extinct. They become legitimate because they make History, in a world that has already proclaimed the end of History. These men and women are an absurdity because they bring back to life a feeling that was lost...”
 
(“News of the survivors”, Eldorado dos Carajás, 1996).
 
For 30 years, the rebuilding of democracy in Brazil has demanded enormous sacrifices from the workers. They had to rebuild their organizations that were destroyed by two decades of repression by the military dictatorship and invent new forms of movements and struggles that could meet the challenge of confronting one of the most unequal societies in the world. This also involved presenting the heirs of the five-century-old slave culture, the workers of the city and of the countryside, as citizens and as legitimate participants, not only in the production of the country’s wealth (as has always been the case) but equally as beneficiaries of sharing the wealth that was produced.
The hatred of the rural and urban oligarchy does not stop focusing for one day on one of the new instruments created by the Brazilian workers in 1984 to organize and struggle: the Movement of the Landless Rural Workers, the MST. And this Movement pays daily with sweat and blood—as recently occurred in Rio Grande do Sul, by daring to question one of the pillars of social inequality in Brazil: the monopolization of land. The gesture of raising their banner in an occupation is translated into an expression that is simple to understand, and for this reason, is intolerable to the ears of the lords of land and of agribusiness.  A country where 1% of the population owns 46% of the land, protected by fences,  by agents of the State, and by hired killers cannot be considered a Republic, much less a democracy.
The Constitution of 1988 specifies that the unproductive estates, as well as lands used for planting the raw materials for the production of drugs, must be targeted for Agrarian Reform. But since the signing of the new Charter, successive governments have neglected to comply with this requirement. The fact that the MST dares to struggle to ensure these rights that were won in the Constitution, to pressure the authorities through peaceful occupations, is compounded by its other bold move, equally intolerable to the capitalist  lords of the countryside and the cities: the legitimate and legal dispute over the Public Budget.
In 40 years, since the creation of INCRA in 1970, around one million rural families have been settled on the land, more than half of them between 2003 and 2008. To make it possible for these families to take part in economic activity, to integrate them into the productive process for food and shares in the new cycle of development, we need to put an end to the daily fight over public resources. This is the reason for the hatred of the rural right wingers and other sectors of big capital, accustomed as they have always been to exclusive access to credit, subsidies, and to periodic forgiveness of their debts.
The government’s commitment to review the criteria for productivity for Brazilian agriculture responds to a four-decade-old demand raised by the movements of rural workers. To demand that these indices be brought up to date, the rural workers are asking for nothing more than compliance with the Federal Constitution and that the scientific and technological advances that have been made in the last four decades be incorporated into the methods for measuring agricultural productivity in our country.
It is against this demand that the rural right-wingers in the National Congress are reacting and attacking the MST. As a reprisal, they are trying once again to request the formation of a Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry against the MST. It would be the third in five years. If Brazilian agriculture is so modern and productive—as agribusiness boasts—why do they fear bringing the indices up to date?
And, why not create a Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry to analyze the public funds that go to the organizations of the rural ruling class? A Commission that takes charge of answering questions as simple as:  what happened for the past 40 years in the Brazilian countryside in terms of a rise in productivity? How much did Brazil invest in a true revolution in new technology, which would have made Brazilian agriculture capable of feeding our people and affirming itself as one of the largest exporters of food? How many loans given out of the public coffers to the large landowners were forgiven in this time period?
The attack on the MST goes beyond the struggle for Agrarian Reform. It’s an attack against the democratic advances won in the 1988 Constitution—such as that which establishes the social function of agricultural property—and against the essential rights for the democratic rebuilding of our country. And it is therefore against this democratic rebuilding that the agribusiness leaders and their allies in the countryside and in the cities have risen up. This is serious.  This is a threat not only against the movements of rural and urban workers but also against all of society. And it is the very democratic rebuilding of Brazil, which cost the efforts and even the lives of many Brazilians that is being opposed. It is the very democratic rebuilding of Brazil that is being violated.
For this reason, today the most conservative sectors in society are mounting a new offensive against the MST, in the National Congress, in the media, in the pressure lobbies in all spheres of power. It’s a matter of once more criminalizing a movement that has consistently raised the banner,  disturbing the democratic conscience of the country—our democracy will only be worthy of the name when it incorporates all Brazilians and grants them as citizens the right to share in the wealth that they produce throughout their lives with their hands, their skills, and their love for the country that belongs to all of us.
 
AGAINST THE CRIMINALIZATION OF THE LANDLESS MOVEMENT.
FOR THE FULFILLMENT OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RULES THAT DEFINE THE LANDS THAT ARE TARGETED FOR AGRARIAN REFORM.
FOR THE IMMEDIATE ADOPTION OF THE NEW PRODUCTION CRITERIA FOR THE PURPOSES OF AGRARIAN REFORM.
Brasília, September 11, 2009.
 
Signed by:
 
Plínio de Arruda Sampaio, presidente da Associação Brasileira de Reforma Agrária - ABRA, ex-Deputado Federal Constituinte pelo PT-SP (1985-1991) e ex-consultor da FAO
Osvaldo Russo, estatístico, ex-presidente do INCRA (1993-1994), diretor da ABRA e coordenador do núcleo agrário nacional do PT
Hamilton Pereira, o Pedro Tierra, 61, é poeta e membro do Conselho Curador da Fundação Perseu Abramo
Antônio Cândido, crítico literário, USP
Leandro Konder, filósofo, PUC-RJ
István Mészáros, Hungria, filósofo
Eduardo Galeano, Uruguai, escritor
Alípio Freire, escritor
Fábio Konder Comparato, jurista, USP e Doutor Honoris Causa da Universidade de Coimbra
Fernando Morais, jornalista e escritor
Dr. Jacques Alfonsin, jurista, Porto Alegre
Altamiro Borges, PCdoB
Nilo Batista, jurista
Alberto Broch, Presidente da CONTAG
Artur Henrique, Presidente da CUT
Augusto Chagas, Presidente da UNE
Bartira Lima da Costa, Presidente da CONAM
Ivan Pinheiro, secretario geral do PCB
Ivan Valente, Deputador Federal PSOL/SP
José Antonio Moroni, diretor da ABONG e do INESC
José Maria de Almeida, CONLUTAS, presidente do PSTU
Nalu Faria, coordenadora geral da Sempreviva Organização Feminista – SOF e integrante da executiva nacional da Marcha Mundial das Mulheres.
Paulo Pereira da Silva, Deputado Federal PDT-SP e presidente da Força Sindical
Renato Rabelo, presidente do PcdoB
Renato Simões, Secretário de Movimentos Populares do PT
Roberto Amaral, ex-Ministro da Ciência e Tecnologia, Secretário Geral do PSB
Sérgio Miranda, PDT-MG
Valter Pomar, Secretário de Relações Internacionais do PT
Wagner Gomes, presidente da Central dos Trabalhadores e Trabalhadoras do Brasil – CTB
Dom Ladislau Biernaski, Presidente da CPT
Dom Pedro Casaldáliga, Bispo emérito da Prelazia de São Félix do Araguaia – MT
Dom Tomás Balduino, conselheiro permanente da CPT
Frei Betto, escritor
Leonardo Boff, escritor
Reverendo Carlos Alberto Tomé da Silva, TSSF, Anglicano, Capelão Militar
Miguel Urbano, Portugal, jornalista
Anita Leocádia Prestes, historiadora, UFRJ
Beth Carvalho, sambista
Adriana Pacheco, Venezuela, ViveTV
Adelaide Gonçalves, historiadora, UFCE
Ana Esther Ceceña, UNAN
Antonio Moraes, Federação Única dos Petroleiros - FUP
Associação Brasileira de ONG's – ABONG
Associação Brasileira dos Estudantes de Engenharia Florestal (ABEEF)
Chico Diaz, ator
Cândido Grzybowski - IBASE
Comitè italiano de apoio ao Movimento Sem Terra (Amigos MST-Italia)
Antônio Carlos Spis, CMS (Coordenação dos Movimentos Sociais)
Dora Martins, juíza de direito, e presidenta da Associação de Juízes pela Democracia
Emir Sader, sociólogo, LPP/UERJ
Federação dos Estudantes de Agronomia do Brasil (FEAB)
Hamilton de Souza, jornalista, PUC-SP
Heloísa Fernandes, socióloga, USP e ENFF
Jose Arbex, jornalista, PUC-SP
Maria Rita Kehl, psicanalista, São Paulo
Osmar Prado, ator
Paulo Arantes, filósofo, USP e ENFF
Vandana Shiva, Índia, cientista
Virginia Fontes, historiadora, UFF/Fiocruz

Vito Gianotti, jornalista e historiador, Núcleo Piratininga de Comunicação - Rio de janeiro 

https://www.alainet.org/es/node/136553

Del mismo autor

Más...

Clasificado en

Clasificado en: 

Temas

Suscribirse a America Latina en Movimiento - RSS