Lacandona: Who are the real "environmental terrorists"?
26/06/2003
- Opinión
Since the end of the Cold War, we have seen the US
government resort to widely varied arguments and
alibis to justify its wars and foreign military
operations, now that it can no longer invoke the famous
communist threat.
In Panama, it was to combat drug trafficking; in Iraq
(1991) to liberate a small invaded country; in Haiti to
overthrow a dictatorship and restore democracy; in
Somalia to bring food to the hungry; in Kosovo to put
an end to genocide; in Afghanistan to combat terrorism;
and in Iraq again (2003) to eradicate weapons of mass
destruction. The Pentagon and intelligence agencies
continue searching for new missions (new excuses) to
justify their budgets and their interventions in the
internal affairs of other countries.
How about invading a country under the pretext of
protecting the environment? Will the United States
armed forces pass up the opportunity to present
themselves as environmentalist champions?
The US Southern Command and the Biological Corridor
In 2001, the Pentagon's Southern Command carried out
maneuvers in El Petén, the Guatemalan jungle region
adjacent to the Mexican border. The maneuvers, dubbed
New Horizons, were of a strictly humanitarian nature,
according to the Southern Command's PR people. The
troops were there to repair roads, to give medical
assistance, build schools and dig wells, assured the US
embassy.
But not all Guatemalans were impressed with
Washington's supposed generosity. Cesar Montes,
secretary of the United Democratic Left, called the
maneuvers "the historical shame of the new millennium,"
and said that the presence of 12,000 US troops in his
country was "technically an invasion."
New Horizons took place precisely as the Plan Puebla-
Panamá (PPP) and the Mesoamerican Biological Corridor
were being formalized. The PPP is a massive
infrastructure plan for Mexico and Central America to
maximize exploitation of the natural resources and
cheap labor of the region, while the Corridor seeks to
consolidate the region's protected natural areas in a
coordinated conservation program. The three initiatives
may appear unconnected, but some in the Mesoamerican
isthmus suspect that they represent new strategies and
mechanisms of control.
Commenting on the handiwork of the Southern Command,
the PPP and the Biological Corridor in the Mexican
daily La Jornada (Feb. 18, 2002), Juan Antonio Zuñiga
wrote that "the interests of the United States armed
forces and the World Bank appear to coincide with the
proposition of the administration of [Mexican]
President Vicente Fox to carry globalization to the
southeast region of Mexico with arguments which
contain ecological elements."
The Biological Corridor "refers to the investment of
capital for 'conservation and sustainable use' of the
natural resources," says economist Gian Carlo Delgado-
Ramos of the Interdisciplinary Research Center of the
Mexican National Autonomous University (UNAM). "It is a
scheme in which 'sustainable use' is understood as the
exploitation of strategic resources (biodiversity,
forests, water, etc.) by a select corporate group,
foreign in its majority."
Ecology and national security
El Petén is adjacent to the Lacandon Selva, the
rainforest region of the Mexican state of Chiapas,
stronghold of the Zapatista National Liberation Army
(EZLN). Since last year, various sectors aligned with
the neoliberal strategy of Fox and Bush have been
asking the Mexican government to intervene in the
Lacandon Selva to put an end to deforestation.
There is no doubt that deforestation is an urgent
problem in the Lacandon. Two centuries ago, the selva
had two million hectares, and has since been reduced to
500,000 due to the surge in such activities as logging
and cattle ranching.
In this besieged jungle is the Montes Azules nature
reserve (331,200 hectares), established by the
government in 1978 and recognized by the United Nation
Environment Program. Within the reserve, 20,000
hectares have already been destroyed, and another
20,000 are in the process of destruction, according to
the IPS news agency.
In December 2001 Adolfo Aguilar-Zinser, ex-national
security chief and Mexico's representative on the UN
Security Council, declared that military force should
be used agaist "environmental terrorism." Later, in
March 2002, La Jornada reported that the environmental
group Conservation International (CI) had asked the
Mexican government to expel the EZLN from the Lacandon
Selva.
In a May 2003 telephone interview with the Puerto Rican
weekly Claridad, Ignacio March, director of CI's Mexico
projects, denied La Jornada's accusations, but stated
that actions must be taken to put an end to invasions
of Montes Azules.
Since Fox assumed the presidency in December 2000, ten
communities of "invaders" have been established in
Montes Azules, bringing the total of ["illegal"]
communities to 45, with a population of 35,000.
These communities are made up of Indians and landless
peasants from other parts of Chiapas, fleeing hunger
and the violence of the paramilitaries. The majority
are sympathizers of the EZLN, while others are
affiliated with ARIC-Independiente, a grassroots
organization which, in contrast to the Zapatistas, are
not armed.
Who are the real invaders?
Progressive sectors in Mexico see the government's
intention to evict "invaders" from the Lacandon as a
charade of neoliberalism and counterinsurgency, with
the real intention to depopulate the area to exploit
its natural resources in concordance with the PPP and
Biological Corridor.
Delgado-Ramos claims that the government's real agenda
in the Lacandona is neither humanitarian nor
environmental, but "to facilitate the intensive
plunder, privatization and exploitation of the natural,
material and human assets of the region by
multinationals involved in bio-genetics, agribusiness,
[trade] in water and electricity/petroleum, and in
minerals, as well as eco-tourism projects by the
multinational hotel industry, which has been strongly
promoted since the Biological Corridor."
The US-based reporter Bill Weinberg, who recently
visited "invader" communities, was impressed at the
ecological and political sophistication of these
supposed environmental delinquents.
In his visit to the community Nuevo San Gregorio,
founded twenty years ago, he found that they have a
sustainable agriculture program, that they have agreed
not to cut the forest, and only use their own
traditional corn seeds, not those sold by agribusiness
corporations. Far from being ignorant provincials, the
villagers spoke with erudition and eloquence about
their constitutional rights, of the relevant
conventions of the International Labor Organization,
and the San Andres Accords, the peace agreement signed
by the EZLN and the government.
This past April, the 32 communities threatened with
eviction presented a formal complaint before the Inter-
American Commission of Human Rights.
Neither the "invader" communities nor the EZLN are
willing to leave the selva. Subcomandante Marcos
announced last December 29 that the Zapatistas will
resist any attempt at eviction, and that they will not
be expelled peacefully.
Three months after these words, just on the border with
Guatemala, American troops participated in new
maneuvers with their Mexican counterparts with the
supposed end of fortifying security and vigilance...
just when the war against Iraq was launched.
* Ruiz-Marrero is a Puerto Rican journalist. He is also
a research associate of the institute for social
ecology, and a fellow of the society of environmental
journalists and the environmental leadership program.
Translated to English by Bill Weinberg
Originally published in Claridad, San Juan,
Puerto Rico, June 27, 2003
PRIMARY SOURCES::
América Latina en Movimiento. "The Mesoamerican
Isthmus: Globalization, Ecology and Security". Feb, 23,
2001.
(http://alainet.org/active/show_text.php3?key=1162)
Diego Cevallos. "Violence Brewing in Montes Azules
Reserve". IPS, June 5, 2003.
Gian Carlo Delgado Ramos. "GeopolÌtica Imperial y
Recursos Naturales". Memoria (Mexico), May 2003.
Bill Weinberg. "Lacandon Selva conflict grows". NACLA
Report on the Americas, May 2003.
https://www.alainet.org/en/articulo/107821?language=es
Del mismo autor
- Transgénicos: Un informe que no pone fin al debate 18/08/2016
- Arroces dorados y consensos científicos 08/07/2016
- Los transgénicos, Greenpeace y los premios Nobel 07/07/2016
- Green islands in Isla Verde (III) 17/06/2016
- Islas verdes en Isla Verde (III) 02/06/2016
- Green islands in Isla Verde (II) 26/05/2016
- Green islands in Isla Verde (I) 22/05/2016
- Islas verdes en Isla Verde (II) 20/05/2016
- Islas verdes en Isla Verde (I) 18/05/2016
- Nueva oleada represiva en Puerto Rico 05/05/2016