It is the Bush Administration, rather than Baghdad, which is supporting Al Qaeda
Fabricating an enemy
28/01/2003
- Opinión
Part II of a two part Series. See: Part I was entitled: War Propaganda.
One of the main objectives of war propaganda is to «fabricate an
enemy» . As anti-war sentiment grows and the political legitimacy the
Bush Administration falters, doubts regarding the existence of this
"outside enemy" must be dispelled.
As the date of the planned invasion of Iraq approaches, the Bush
Administration and its indefectible British ally have multiplied the
"warnings" of future Al Qaeda terrorist attacks. The enemy has to
appear genuine: thousands of news stories and editorials linking Al
Qaeda to the Baghdad government are planted in the news chain. Colin
Powell underscored this relationship in his presentation to the Davos
World Economic Forum in January. Iraq is casually presented in
official statements and in the media as "a haven for and supplier of
the terror network":
"Evidence that is still tightly held is accumulating within the
administration that it is not a matter of chance that terror groups
in the al Qaeda universe have made their weapons of choice the
poisons, gases and chemical devices that are signature arms of the
Iraqi regime."1
In this context, propaganda purports to drown the truth, and kill the
evidence on how Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda was fabricated and
transformed into "Enemy Number One".
Meanwhile, "anti-terrorist operations" directed against Muslims,
including arbitrary mass arrests have been stepped up. In the US,
emergency measures are contemplated in the case of war. The corporate
media is busy preparing public opinion. A «national emergency» is
said to be justified because «America is under attack»:
« the U.S. and Western interests in the Western world have to be
prepared for retaliatory attacks from sleeper cells the second we
launch an attack in Iraq.» 2
Defence of the Homeland
Emergency procedures are already in place. The Secretary of Homeland
Defence -whose mandate is to «safeguard the nation from terrorist
attacks»-- has already been granted the authority « to take control
of a national emergency», implying the establishment of de facto
military rule. In turn, the newly established Northern Command would
be put in charge of military operations in the US «war on terrorism »
theatre.
The Smallpox Vaccination Program
In the context of these emergency measures, preparations for
compulsory smallpox vaccination are already under way in response to
a presumed threat of a biological weapons attack on US soil. The
vaccination program which has been the object of intense media
propaganda-- would be launched with the sole purpose of creating an
atmosphere of panic among the population:
«A few infected individuals with a stack of plane tickets--or bus
tickets, for that matter--could spread smallpox infection across the
country, touching off a plague of large proportions …. It is not
inconceivable that a North Korea or an Iraq could retain smallpox in
a hidden lab and pass the deadly agent on to terrorists.»3
The hidden agenda is crystal clear. How best to discredit the anti-
war movement and maintain the legitimacy of the State? Create
conditions, which instill fear and hatred, present the rulers as
"guardians of the peace", committed to weeding out terrorism and
preserving democracy. In the words of British Prime Minister Tony
Blair, echoing almost verbatim the US propaganda dispatches:
"'I believe it is inevitable that they will try in some form or
other,… 'I think we can see evidence from the recent arrests that the
terrorist network is here as it is around the rest of Europe, around
the rest of the world… The most frightening thing about these people
is the possible coming together of fanaticism and the technology
capable of delivering mass destruction.'"4
Mass Arrests
The mass arrests of individuals of Middle Eastern origin since
September 11 2001 on trumped up charges is not motivated by security
considerations. Their main function is to provide "credibility" to
the fear and propaganda campaign. Each arrest, amply publicised by
the corporate media, repeated day after day "gives a face" to this
invisible enemy. It also serves to drown the fact that Al Qaeda is a
creature of the CIA. "Enemy Number One" is not an enemy but an
instrument.)
In other words, the Propaganda campaign performs two important
functions.
First it must ensure that the enemy is considered a real threat.
Second, it must distort the truth, --i.e. it must conceal "the
relationship" between this "fabricated enemy" and its creators within
the military-intelligence apparatus.
In other words, the nature and history of Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda
and the Islamic brigades since the Soviet-Afghan war must be
suppressed because if it trickles down to the broader public, the
legitimacy of the so-called "war on terrorism" collapses like a deck
of cards. And in the process, the legitimacy of the main political
and military actors is threatened.
The "9/11 Foreknowledge" Scandal
On 16 May 2002, the New York tabloids revealed that "President Bush
had been warned of possible high jacking before the terror attacks"
and had failed to act.5
The disinformation campaign was visibly stalling in the face of
mounting evidence of CIA-Osama links. For the first time since 9/11,
the mainstream press had hinted to the possibility of a cover-up at
the highest echelons of the US State apparatus.
FBI Agent Coleen Rowley, who blew the whistle on the FBI, played a
key role in unleashing the crisis. Her controversial Memo to FBI
Director Robert Mueller pointed to the existence of "deliberate
roadblocks" on the investigation of the September 11 attacks:
"Minutes after the 9/11 attacks the SSA [David Frasca, Director of
the Radical Fundamentalist unit in the FBI] said 'this was probably
all just a coincidence' and we were to do nothing until we got their
permission, because we might screw up something else going on
elsewhere in the country" 6
In response to an impending political crisis, the fear and
disinformation campaign went into overdrive. The news chain was all
of a sudden inundated with reports and warnings of "future terrorist
attacks". A carefully worded statement (visibly intended to instill
fear) by Vice President Dick Cheney contributed to setting the stage:
"I think that the prospects of a future attack on the U.S. are almost
a certainty... It could happen tomorrow, it could happen next week,
it could happen next year, but they will keep trying. And we have to
be prepared."7
What Cheney is really telling us is that our "intelligence asset",
which we created, is going to strike again. Now, if this "CIA
creature" were planning new terrorist attacks, you would expect that
the CIA would be first to know about it. In all likelihood, the CIA
also controls the so-called 'warnings' emanating from CIA sources on
"future terrorist attacks" in the US and around the World.
Propaganda's Consistent Pattern
Upon careful examination of news reports on actual, "possible" or
"future" terrorist attacks, the propaganda campaign exhibits a
consistent pattern. Similar concepts appear simultaneously in
hundreds of media reports:
they refer to "reliable sources", a growing body of evidence --e.g.
government or intelligence or FBI.
They invariably indicate that the terrorist groups involved have
"ties to bin Laden" or Al Qaeda, or are "sympathetic to bin Laden",
The reports often points to the possibility of terrorist attacks,
"sooner or later" or "in the next two months".
The reports often raise the issue of so-called "soft targets",
pointing to the likelihood of civilian casualties.
They indicate that future terrorist attacks could take place in a
number of allied countries (including Britain, France, Germany) in
which public opinion is strongly opposed to the US-led war on
terrorism.
They confirm the need by the US and its allies to initiate "pre-
emptive" actions directed against these various terrorist
organizations and/or the foreign governments which harbour the
terrorists.
They often point to the likelihood that these terrorist groups
possess WMD including biological and chemical weapons (as well as
nuclear weapons). The links to Iraq and "rogue states" (discussed in
Part I) is also mentioned. The warnings also include warnings
regarding "attacks on US soil", attacks against civilians in Western
cities.
They point to efforts undertaken by the police authorities to
apprehend the alleged terrorists.
The arrested individuals are in virtually all cases Muslims and/or of
Middle Eastern origin.
The reports are also used to justify the Homeland Security
legislation as well as the "ethnic profiling" and mass arrests of
presumed terrorists.
This pattern of disinformation in the Western media applies the usual
catch phrases and buzz words. (See press excerpts below. The relevant
catch phrases are indicated in italics):
"Published reports, along with new information obtained from U.S.
intelligence and military sources, point to a growing body of
evidence that terrorists associated with and/or sympathetic to Osama
bin Laden are planning a significant attack on U.S. soil.
Also targeted are allied countries that have joined the worldwide
hunt for the radical Muslim cells hell-bent on unleashing new waves
of terrorist strikes. … The U.S. government's activation of
antiterrorist forces comes as the FBI issued a warning Nov. 14 that a
"spectacular" new terrorist attack may be forthcoming - sooner rather
than later. ...
Elsewhere, the Australian government issued an unprecedented warning
to its citizens that al-Qaeda terrorists there might launch attacks
within the next two months. 8
Although CIA Director George Tenet said in recent congressional
testimony that "an attempt to conduct another attack on U.S. soil is
certain," a trio of former senior CIA officials doubted the chance of
any "spectacular" terror attacks on U.S. soil.
"Germans have been skittish since the terrorist attacks in the United
States, fearing that their country is a ripe target for terrorism.
Several of the hijackers in the Sept. 11 attacks plotted their moves
in Hamburg.10
"On Dec. 18, a senior government official, speaking on condition of
anonymity, briefed journalists about the 'high probability' of a
terrorist attack happening 'sooner or later.' … he named hotels and
shopping centres as potential 'soft targets'… The official also
specifically mentioned: a possible chemical attack in the London
subway, the unleashing of smallpox, the poisoning of the water supply
and strikes against "postcard targets" such as Big Ben and Canary
Warf.
The "sooner or later" alert followed a Home Office warning at the end
of November that said Islamic radicals might use dirty bombs or
poison gas to inflict huge casualties on British cities. This also
made big headlines but the warning was quickly retracted in fear that
it would cause public panic. 11
The message yesterday was that these terrorists, however obscure, are
trying - and, sooner or later, may break through London's defences.
It is a city where tens of thousands of souls,… Experts have
repeatedly said that the UK, with its bullish support for the US and
its war on terror, is a genuine and realistic target for terror
groups, including the al- Qaeda network led by 11 September
mastermind Osama bin Laden.12
Quoting Margaret Thatcher: "Only America has the reach and means to
deal with Osama bin Laden or Saddam Hussein or the other wicked
psychopaths who will sooner or later step into their shoes."13
According to a recent US State Department alert: "Increased security
at official US facilities has led terrorists to seek softer targets
such as residential areas, clubs, restaurants, places of worship,
hotels, schools, outdoor recreation events, resorts, beaches and
planes."14
Actual Terrorist Attacks
To be "effective" the fear and disinformation campaign cannot solely
rely on unsubstantiated "warnings" of future attacks, it also
requires "real" terrorist occurrences or "incidents", which provide
credibility to the Administration's war plans. Propaganda endorses
the need to implement "emergency measures" as well as implement
retaliatory military actions.
The triggering of "war pretext incidents" is part of the Pentagon's
assumptions. In fact it is an integral part of US military history.15
In fact in 1962, the Joint Chiefs of Staff had envisaged a secret
plan entitled "Operation Northwoods, to deliberately trigger civilian
casualties to justify the invasion of Cuba:
"We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," "We
could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in
other Florida cities and even in Washington" "casualty lists in U.S.
newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation." (See
the declassified Top Secret 1962 document titled "Justification for
U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba"16 (See Operation Northwoods at
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/NOR111A.html ).
There is no evidence that the Pentagon or the CIA played a direct
role in recent terrorist attacks. The latter were undertaken by
organisations (or cells of these organisations), which operate quite
independently, with a certain degree of autonomy. This independence
is in the very nature of a covert intelligence operation. The
«intelligence asset» is not in direct contact with its covert
sponsors. It is not necessarily cognizant of the role it plays on
behalf of its intelligence sponsors.
The fundamental question is who is behind them? Through what sources
are they being financed? What is the underlying network of ties?
A recent (2002) classified outbrief drafted to guide the Pentagon
«calls for the creation of a so-called « Proactive, Pre-emptive
Operations Group » (P2OG), to launch secret operations aimed at
"stimulating reactions" among terrorists and states possessing
weapons of mass destruction -- that is, for instance, prodding
terrorist cells into action and exposing themselves to "quick-
response" attacks by U.S. forces.» 17
The P2OG initiative is nothing new. It essentially extends an
existing apparatus of covert operations. Amply documented, the CIA
has supported terrorist groups since the Cold War era. This «
prodding of terrorist cells » under covert intelligence operations
often requires the infiltration and training of the radical groups
linked to Al Qaeda.
Covert support by the US military and intelligence apparatus has been
channelled to various Islamic terrorist organisations through a
complex network of intermediaries and intelligence proxies. Moreover,
numerous official statements, intelligence reports confirm recent
links (in the post Cold War era) between US military-intelligence
units and Al Qaeda operatives, as occurred in Bosnia (mid 1990s),
Kosovo (1998-99) and Macedonia (2001).18 The Republican Party
Committee of the US Congress in a 1997 report points to open
collaboration between the US military and Al Qaeda operatives in the
civil war in Bosnia.19 (See US Congress, 16 January 1997,
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/DCH109A.html )
Ties to Al Qaeda and Pakistan's Military Intelligence (ISI)
It is indeed revealing that in virtually all post 9/11 terrorist
occurrences, the terrorist organization is said to have "ties to
Osama bin Laden's Al Qaeda". This in itself is a crucial piece of
information. Of course, the fact that Al Qaeda is a creature of the
CIA is neither mentioned in the press reports nor is considered
relevant.
The ties of these terrorist organizations (particularly those in
Asia) to Pakistan's military intelligence (ISI) is acknowledged in a
few cases by official sources and press dispatches. Confirmed by the
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), some of these groups are said to
have links to Pakistan's ISI, without identifying the nature of these
links. Needless to say, this information is crucial in identifying
the sponsors of these terrorist attacks. In other words, the ISI is
said to support these terrorist organizations, while at same time
maintaining close ties to the CIA.
The Bali Bomb Attack (October 2002)
The Bali attack in the Kuta seaside resort resulted in close to 200
deaths, mainly Australian tourists. The bomb attack was allegedly
perpetrated by Jemaah Islamiah, a group, which operates in several
countries in South East Asia. Press reports and official statements
point to close ties between Jemaah Islamiah (JI) and Al Qaeda. The
JI's "operational leader" is Riduan Isamuddin, alias Hambali, a
veteran of the Soviet-Afghan war, who was trained in Afghanistan and
Pakistan. According to a report by UPI:
"The [Soviet-Afghan] war provided opportunities for key figures of
these groups, who went to Afghanistan, to experience firsthand the
glory of jihad. Many of the radicals detained in Singapore and
Malaysia derived their ideological inspiration from the activities of
the Mujahideen in Afghanistan and Pakistan" 20
What the report fails to mention is that the training of the
Mujahideen in Afghanistan and Pakistan was a CIA sponsored initiative
launched under President Jimmy Carter in 1979, using Pakistan's ISI
as a go-between.
JI's links to Indonesia's Military Intelligence
There are indications, that in addition to its alleged links to Al
Qaeda, Jemaah Islamiah also has links to Indonesia's military
intelligence, which in turn has links to the CIA and Australian
intelligence.
The links between JI and Indonesia's Intelligence Agency (BIN) are
acknowledged by the International Crisis Group (ICG):
"This link [of JI to the BIN] needs to be explored more fully: it
does not necessarily mean that military intelligence was working with
JI, but it does raise a question about the extent to which it knew or
could have found out more about JI than it has acknowledged." 21
(International Crisis Group,
http://www.crisisweb.org/projects/showreport.cfm?reportid=845 , 2003)
The ICG, however, fails to mention that Indonesia's intelligence
apparatus has for more than 30 years been controlled by the CIA.
In the wake of the October 2002 Bali bombing, a contradictory report
emanating from Indonesia's top brass, pointed to the involvement of
both the head of Indonesian intelligence General A. M. Hendropriyono
as well as the CIA:
"The agency and its director, Gen. A. M. Hendropriyono, are well
regarded by the United States and other governments. But there are
still senior intelligence officers here who believe that the C.I.A.
was behind the bombing."22
In response to these statements, the Bush Administration demanded
that President Megawati Sukarnoputri, publicly refute the involvement
of the U.S in the attacks. No official retraction was issued. Not
only did President. Megawati remained silent on this matter, she also
accused the US of being:
"a superpower that forced the rest of the world to go along with it…
We see how ambition to conquer other nations has led to a situation
where there is no more peace unless the whole world is complying with
the will of the one with the power and strength." 23
Meanwhile, the Bush Administration, had used the Bali attacks to prop
up its fear campaign:
"President Bush said Monday that he assumes al-Qaeda was responsible
for the deadly bombing in Indonesia and that he is worried about
fresh attacks on the United States." 24
The news [regarding the Bali attack] came as US intelligence
officials warned that more attacks like the Indonesian bombing can be
expected in the next few months, in Europe, the Far East or the
US."25
Cover-up
The links of JI to the Indonesian intelligence agency were never
raised in the official Indonesian government investigation --which
was guided behind the scenes by Australian intelligence and the CIA.
Moreover, shortly after the bombing, Australian Prime Minister John
Howard "admitted that Australian authorities were warned about
possible attacks in Bali but chose not to issue a warning."26 Also In
the wake of the bombings, the Australian government chose to work
with Indonesia's Special Forces the Kopassus, in the so-called "war
on terrorism".
Australia: "Useful Wave of Indignation"
Reminiscent of Operation Northwoods, the Bali attack served to
trigger "a useful wave of indignation."27 They contributed to swaying
Australian public opinion in favour of the US invasion of Iraq, while
weakening the anti-war protest movement. In the wake of the Bali
attack, the Australian government "officially" joined the US-led "war
on terrorism." It has not only used the Bali bombings as a pretext to
fully integrate the US-UK military axis, it has also adopted drastic
police measures including "ethnic profiling" directed against its own
citizens:
Prime Minister John Howard made the extraordinary declaration
recently that he is prepared to make pre-emptive military strikes
against terrorists in neighbouring Asian countries planning to attack
Australia. Australian intelligence agencies also are very worried
about the likelihood of an al-Qaeda attack using nuclear weapons.28
The Attacks on the Indian Parliament (December 2001) The December
2001 terrorist attacks on the Indian Parliament --which contributed
to pushing India and Pakistan to the brink of war-- were allegedly
conducted by two Pakistan-based rebel groups, Lashkar-e-Taiba ("Army
of the Pure") and Jaish-e-Muhammad ("Army of Mohammed"). The press
reports acknowledged the ties of both groups to Al Qaeda, without
however mentioning that they were directly supported by Pakistan=s
ISI. The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) confirms in this regard
that:
"through its Interservices Intelligence agency (ISI), Pakistan has
provided funding, arms, training facilities, and aid in crossing
borders to Lashkar and Jaish…Many were given ideological training in
the same madrasas, or Muslim seminaries, that taught the Taliban and
foreign fighters in Afghanistan. They received military training at
camps in Afghanistan or in villages in Pakistan-controlled Kashmir.
Extremist groups [supported by the ISI] have recently opened several
new madrasas in Azad Kashmir."29 (Council on Foreign Relations at
http://www.terrorismanswers.com/groups/harakat2.html , Washington
2002)
What the CFR fails to mention is the crucial relationship between the
ISI and the CIA and the fact that the ISI continues to support
Lashkar, Jaish and the militant Jammu and Kashmir Hizbul Mujahideen
(JKHM), while also collaborating with the CIA. Ironically, confirmed
by the writings of Zbigniew Brzezinski (who happens to be a member of
the CFR), the training of these "foreign fighters" was an initiative
of US foreign policy, launched during the Carter Administration in
1979 at the outset of the Soviet-Afghan war. Coinciding with the 1989
Geneva Peace Agreement and the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan,
the ISI was instrumental in the creation of the militant Jammu and
Kashmir Hizbul Mujahideen (JKHM).30 The timely attack on the Indian
Parliament, followed by the ethnic riots in Gujarat in early 2002,
were the culmination of a process initiated in the 1980s, financed by
drug money and abetted by Pakistan's military intelligence.
Dismantling the Propaganda Campaign, Building an Anti-War Consensus
We are at the juncture of the most serious crisis in modern history,
requiring an unprecedented degree of solidarity, courage and
commitment. America's war, which includes the "first strike" use of
nuclear weapons, threatens the future of humanity.
Much of the justification for waging this war without borders rests
on the legitimacy of the Bush administration's anti-terrorist
programme. The latter forms part of the propaganda campaign, which in
turn is used to sway the US population into an unconditional
acceptance of the war agenda.
In the US, and around the world, the anti-war movement has gained in
impetus. While millions of people have joined hands in opposing the
war, the Bush Administration's fear and disinformation campaign,
relayed by the corporate media, has served to uphold the shaky
legitimacy of the Bush administration.
At this critical crossroads, the anti-war/pro-democracy movement must
necessarily move to a higher plane, which addresses the main
functions of the Administration's propaganda machine. The main
purpose of propaganda is to sustain the legitimacy of the rulers and
ensure that the rulers remain in power.
Undermining the Bush Administration's « Right to Rule» In other
words, the mobilization of antiwar sentiment in itself will not
reverse the tide of war.
What is needed is to consistently challenge the legitimacy of the
main political and military actors, reveal the true face of the
American Empire and the underlying criminalisation of foreign policy.
Ultimately what is required is to question and eventually undermine
the Bush Administration's «right to rule».
Revealing the lies behind the Bush Administration is the basis for
destroying the legitimacy of the main political and military actors.
Even if a majority of the population is against the war, this in
itself will not prevent the war from occurring. The propaganda
campaign's objective is to sustain the lies which support the
legitimacy of the main political and military actors, including Bush,
Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Tenet, Armitage, Rice, et al. As long as
the Bush Cabinet is considered a «legitimate government» in the eyes
of the people and World public opinion, it will carry out the Iraqi
invasion plan, whether it has public support or not.
In other words, this legitimacy must be challenged. Similarly in
Britain, where a majority of the population is against the US-led
war, actions must be launched which ultimately result in the downfall
of the Blair Cabinet and the withdrawal of Britain from the US-led
military coalition.
A necessary condition for bringing down the rulers is to weaken and
eventually dismantle their propaganda campaign. How best to achieve
this objective? By fully uncovering the lies behind the « war on
terrorism» and revealing the complicity of the Bush administration in
the events of 9/11.
This is a big hoax, it's the biggest lie in US history. The war
pretext does not stick and the rulers should be removed.
Moreover, it is important to show that « Enemy Number One » is
fabricated. The terrorist attacks are indeed real, but who is behind
them? The covert operations in support of terrorist organisations,
including the history of Al Qaeda's links to the CIA since the Soviet
Afghan war, must be fully revealed because they relate directly to
the wave of terrorist attacks which have occurred since September 11,
all of which are said to have links to Al Qaeda.
To reverse the tide, the spreading of information at all levels,
which counteracts the propaganda campaign is required.
The truth undermines and overshadows the lie.
And the truth is that the Bush administration is in fact supporting
international terrorism as a pretext to wage war on Iraq.
Once this truth becomes fully understood, the legitimacy of the
rulers will collapse like a deck of cards. This is what has to be
achieved. But we can only achieve it, by effectively counteracting
the official propaganda campaign.
The momentum and success of the large anti-war rallies in the US, the
European Union and around the world, should lay the foundations of a
permanent network composed of tens of thousands of local level anti-
war committees in neighbourhoods, work places, parishes, schools,
universities, etc. It is ultimately through this network that the
legitimacy of those who "rule in our name will be challenged.
To shunt the Bush Administration's war plans and disable its
propaganda machine, we must, in the months ahead reach out to our
fellow citizens across the land, in the US, Canada and around the
world, to the millions of ordinary people who have been misled on the
causes and consequences of this war, not to mention the implications
of the Bush Administration's Homeland Security legislation, which
essentially sets in place the building blocks of a police state.
This initiative requires the spreading of information in an extensive
grassroots network, with a view to weakening and ultimately disabling
the Bush Administration's propaganda machine.
When the lies including those concerning September 11 are fully
revealed and understood by everybody, the legitimacy of the Bush
Administration will be broken Big Brother will have no leg to stand
on, that is, no more wars to feed on. While this will not necessarily
result in a fundamental and significant "regime change" in the US, a
new "anti-war consensus" will have emerged, which will eventually
pave the way for a broader struggle against the New World Order and
the American Empire's quest for global domination.
_______________
NOTES
1. Washington Post, 25 January 2003.
2. Ibid
3 Chicago Sun, 31 December 2002.
4 Reuters, 21 February 2003
5. See Ian Woods, Conspiracy of Silence, McKinney Vindicated, Global
Outlook, No. 2, 2002.
6. Coleen Rowley, Memo To FBI Director Robert Mueller, quoted in
Global Outlook, No. 3, 2003, p. 28.
7. The Boston Globe, 5 June 2002.
8. Insight on the News, 3 February 2003.
9. UPI, 19 December 2002.
10. New York Times, 6 January 2003.
11. Toronto Star, 5 January 2003.
12. The Scotsman, 8 January 2003.
13. UPI, 10 December 2002.
14. AFP, 3 January 2003.
15. See Richard Sanders, War Pretext Incidents, How to Start a War,
Global Outlook, published in two parts, Issues 2 and 3, 2002-2003.
16.Operation Northwoods, declassified top secret document sent by the
Joint Chiefs of Staff to Secretary of Defence Robert McNamara on
March 13, 1962, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/NOR111A.html .
17. William Arkin, The Secret War, The Los Angeles Times, 27 October
2002.
18. See Michel Chossudovsky, War and Globalisation, The Truth behind
September 11, Global Outlook, 2003, Chapter 3,
http://globalresearch.ca/globaloutlook/truth911.html
19. See Clinton-Approved Iranian Arms Transfers Help Turn Bosnia into
Militant Islamic Base, Congressional Press Release, US Congress, 16
January 1997, http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/DCH109A.html
20. UPI, 6 January 2002.
21. International Crisis Group, Indonesia Backgrounder: How The
Jemaah Islamiyah Terrorist Network Operates,
http://www.crisisweb.org/projects/showreport.cfm?reportid=845 , 2003
22, Raymond Bonner and Jane Perlez, More Attacks on Westerners Are
Expected in Indonesia, New York Times, 25 November 2002
23. Quoted in Raymond Bonner and Jane Perlez, op cit.
24. USA Today, 15 October 2002.
25. Business AM, 15 October 2002.
26. Christchurch Press, 22 November 2002), (Similar warnings were
made by the CIA).
27. Operation Northwoods, op cit.
28. Insight on the News, 3 February 2003.
29. Council on Foreign Relations at:
http://www.terrorismanswers.com/groups/harakat2.html , Washington
2002.
30. See K. Subrahmanyam, Pakistan is Pursuing Asian Goals, India
Abroad, 3 November 1995.
-------------------------
ANNEX
Supporting evidence that successive US administrations have supported
Al Qaeda is summarized below (references are provided to a selected
bibliography):
The "Islamic Brigades" are a creation of US foreign policy. In the
post-Cold War era, the CIA continues to support and use Osama bin
Laden's Al Qaeda in its covert operations. In standard CIA jargon, Al
Qaeda is categorized as an "intelligence asset".
The U.S. Congress has documented in detail, the links of Al Qaeda to
agencies of the U.S. government during the civil war in Bosnia-
Herzegovina, as well as in Kosovo and Macedonia.
The evidence confirms that Al Qaeda is supported by Pakistan's
military intelligence, the Inter-services Intelligence (ISI). Amply
documented, the ISI, allegedly played an undercover role in financing
the 9/11 attacks. The ISI has a close working relationship with the
CIA. Pakistan's ISI has consistently supported various Islamic
terrorist organizations, while also collaborating with the CIA.
These various terrorist groups supported by Pakistan's ISI operate
with some degree of autonomy in relation to their covert sponsors,
but ultimately they act in the way which serves US interests.
The CIA keeps track of its "intelligence assets". Amply documented,
Osama bin Laden's whereabouts are known. Al Qaeda is infiltrated by
the CIA. In other words, there were no "intelligence failures"! The
9-11 terrorists did not act on their own volition. The suicide
hijackers were instruments in a carefully planned intelligence
operation.
For further details consult: Centre for Research on Globalization,
9/11 Reader, which constitutes and extensive bibliography at
http://globalresearch.ca//by-topic/sept11/
See also Michel Chossudovsky, War and Globalisation, The Truth behind
September 11, Global Outlook, 2002
http://globalresearch.ca/globaloutlook/truth911.html
Centre for Research on Globalization, Foreknowledge of 9/11 A
Compilation of CRG articles and documents in support of a 9-11
Investigation, http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CRG204A.html
* Michel Chossudovsky is author of War and Globalisation, the Truth
behind September 11, for details see
http://globalresearch.ca/globaloutlook/truth911.html
https://www.alainet.org/en/articulo/106906
Del mismo autor
- El escándalo del estudio sobre hidroxicloroquina 15/06/2020
- Coronavirus, una “falsa alarma”: Campaña contra el racismo y el neoliberalismo 12/06/2020
- Capitalismo global, “Gobierno mundial” y la crisis del coronavirus 22/05/2020
- En 2009 la vacuna contra la gripe H1N1 provocó daño cerebral en niños 19/05/2020
- “The Terrorists R Us.” The Islamic State “Big Lie” 25/09/2014
- Reservas-ouro da Ucrânia são evacuadas secretamente e levadas para os Estados Unidos 19/03/2014
- Climate Change: The Philippines Haiyan Typhoon is not the Result of Global Warming 19/11/2013
- Dangerous Crossroads: The Threat of a Pre-emptive Nuclear War directed against Iran 27/03/2013
- Terrorismo com face humana: a história dos esquadrões da morte dos Estados Unidos 15/01/2013
- Towards a "Soft Invasion"? The Launching of a "Humanitarian War" against Syria 05/08/2012
Clasificado en
Guerra y Paz
- Prabir Purkayastha 08/04/2022
- Prabir Purkayastha 08/04/2022
- Adolfo Pérez Esquivel 06/04/2022
- Adolfo Pérez Esquivel 05/04/2022
- Vijay Prashad 04/04/2022