The dangers of GMOs, the interests of multinationals and manipulation by the media.
15/06/2003
- Opinión
Brazilian society is being bombarded every day by falsified
news generated by the lobbies of large, multinational
companies that want to impose Genetically Modified (GM)
seeds on us as though they are a necessity; a question of
progress. These companies present only the alleged
advantages and conceal the dangers to the public and to our
national and food sovereignty. But what is really at stake?
On the one hand there are multinationals, such as Monsanto,
Cargill, Bung, Du Pont, Sygenta and Bayer, with an interest
in financial profits and in controlling the monopoly of
these seeds. On the other, the interests of the honest
farmers and of the Brazilian people. This is the real
confrontation arising from the issue of Genetically Modified
Organisms (GMO)s.
In their ambition to gain control of Brazilian agriculture
and to secure a monopoly over the seeds, in particular soya,
maize, wheat, sunflower and cotton, these companies and
their lobbyists are proclaiming that GMOs are more
productive and more profitable than the seeds produced by
their competitors. If the criterion for farming were always
to favor those products that are more profitable, surely
only the planting of tobacco and marijuana should be
encouraged! Farmers have a responsibility to produce food.
Healthy food, that is safe for the entire population.
One variety of GM maize has been eradicated in the United
States because of its detrimental effects to human and
animal health. As yet no study has been conducted to assess
the safety of soya, and this crop may therefore also have
implications for human health in the future. Furthermore, it
has been proven that the necessity of combining these crops
with an intensive use of the agro-toxic Roundup, will, over
the years, affect the soil life and the environment. It is
for this reason that for over four years legal action has
been taken against Monsanto, who did not manage to present
any report to support their claims that the soya which the
company produces does not cause any harm to the Brazilian
environment, as stipulated by the Constitution.
Of the total area of cultivated land in the world, less than
10% is used to grow GM seeds and 95% of the GMOs that are
produced in the world, are produced by only three countries:
the United States, Canada and Argentina, where US
multinationals control the market. Why is it that all the
other countries prefer to be cautious?
Throughout the world, and in particular in Europe and Asia,
consumers are anti the consumption of GM products, whose
health implications are uncertain. Brazilians are in favor
of the use of biotechnology, and indeed farmers have been
applying it pragmatically throughout the history of mankind.
However, we are in favor of biotechnology that is
responsible towards the public and towards the future of the
environment.
If we are able to feed our people, with products cultivated
from another, safer and more healthy type of seed, then why
take the risk with GM products? Should we do so only for the
sake of guaranteeing Monsanto`s profit margins?
Monsanto is attempting, in any way it can, to introduce GM
farming to Brazil because this is its final chance. In the
United States the company has lost more than one million
dollars and its stocks have fallen 27% in the last year.
Monsanto obtained the lowest listing on the New York Stock
Exchange and yet still has the arrogance to want to charge
royalties to Brazilian exporters and farmers., which were
induced to commit two crimes: the illegal planting of its
Roundup soya seeds, which were smuggled from Argentina.
Monsanto should charge royalties to FARSUL, an entity of the
"gauchos" landowners, for distributing GM seeds!
Brazil needs legislation that will guarantee the right to
protect public health and prevent multinationals from
holding the monopoly over our seeds, placing national
sovereignty at risk. For now, this is covered by Provisional
Measure (MP) 113, which has been sanctioned by the House and
which deregulates the temporary trade of Argentine soya from
this year's harvest, but maintains the strict ban on the
cultivation of any GM seeds for trade purposes. The
government is preparing a new, definitive law to substitute
the MP, which will be delivered to congress within the next
month.
An in-depth debate is needed, involving all of Brazilian
society: the consumers in the cities. Brazilians need to
voice their opinion and put pressure on the government and
members of parliament.
The US company Monsanto has been spending millions on
lobbying, financing campaigns, paying for trips to
delegations in the United States, publishing propaganda in
the media, feeding information to journalists and
commentators, simply in order to assure their own profits.
We hope that the Brazilian government and members of
parliament will act on the side of the people and not on the
side of the US capital. This is a matter of public health
and of national and food sovereignty. If the government and
congress choose the wrong side they will be held accountable
by history and by the people!
(Translation by ALAI)
* Joao Pedro Stedile is Leader of the MST (The Brazilian
Landless Workers Movement) and of the Via Campesina
https://www.alainet.org/en/active/3900
Del mismo autor
- Los dilemas populares en tiempos de crisis del capitalismo 05/11/2021
- Notas sobre as eleições municipais depois do segundo turno 01/12/2020
- Minhas palavras ao ministro Gilmar Mendes 19/08/2020
- Salve o centenário de Florestan Fernandes e Celso Furtado! 16/07/2020
- Medidas de emergência de reforma agrária para enfrentar a crise 05/06/2020
- Em defesa da vida do povo, mudar o governo! 30/04/2020
- Salvar vidas, reorganizar a economia e derrotar Bolsonaro 01/04/2020
- O poder político das empresas de agrotóxicos 02/03/2020
- Um raio-X da oposição direitista da Venezuela 20/01/2020
- Os retrocessos do governo na política agrária, agrícola e ambiental 02/01/2020
