To member governments of the governing body of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources (IT PGRFA), Meeting in Rome 5-9 October 2015:

We want to tell you that you are in the process of destroying the treaty. It is organising the theft of our seeds and our knowledge. We can no longer continue to give them to researchers and other prospectors that come and collect them in our fields, to then put them in the Treaty’s gene banks. As long as you do not ban all bio-pirated patents, as long as farmers do not have a right to keep, use, exchange and sell seeds from their own harvests then we will not collaborate with research and gene banks that serve the multinational seed companies.

The grains kept in genetic resource banks run by the multilateral system of the Treaty on Plants (IT PGRFA) belong to us: they are our inheritance from many centuries of peasant selection, and they have been collected in our fields.

However we are often refused access to peasant variety seeds because we are not researchers. Sometimes we obtain some grains on the condition that we do not use them for agricultural production: they can only be used for research purposes. We have stated that their conservation in cold chambers is not appropriate and that they need several years of new selection before the harvests can be donated in the current growing conditions. However those of us who undertake the collection the genetic resources are forbidden by laws created by seed companies in the majority of member countries of the treaty to exchange or sell them to other peasants.

The treaty promised equitable sharing of the profit created in industry using our seeds for their own selections. After 10 years we have not seen this, rather a shift in the opposite direction. Peasants have given seeds to industry; industry never paid for them, and the little money that governments donated has not been given to peasant organisations, but has consolidated international industry’s research programmes. We gave our seeds free of charge to the seed banks, and we accept that industry uses the useful varieties. But when we use these varieties laws in the majority of signatory countries require us to pay royalties, or forbid us to use the seeds that have come from our own harvests, asserting that they are now property of industry.

We inherited our seeds from our parents, we have looked after them carefully, selected and conserved them for future generations. We have given them to the treaty along with our knowledge, as we have always been proud to share the results of our work. We thought that we were protected against their being appropriated by industry property laws, such as plant breeders’ laws and patents. But now you say that you are going to launch the Divseek programme, to dissect the genetic sequences of the resources in the gene bank so as to publish them in electronic databases. This programme was not created for us, we do not grow genetic sequences, or megabytes, and we do not need this information. But industry created the search engines and software to process all of the ‘genetic information’ in their database, for it to be patented and associated with some favourable characteristic, useful for agriculture, or the industrial processing of harvests. These patents on the ‘functional units of heredity’ are already legal in many countries and they prevent us from growing our seeds, the very seeds that we gave free of charge to the treaty seed banks.

We had a period of dialogue with the treaty. But despite the governing body’s decision in Bali in 2011 and in Oman in 2013, spaces for dialogue closed up, preventing us from participating in an efficient manner and formalising working groups with expert consultants, respecting our organisational autonomy. Peasant organisations that are working in their fields to implement article 5 and 6 of the Treaty on in situ conservation and the sustainable use of seeds and those that fight for the implementation of article 9 on the rights of farmers are always considered as ‘observers’, with the same status as academics or journalists, but there are the main actors and on the front line of managing the very genetic plant resources that the Treaty defends! Yet Industry is courted and imposes its own solutions.

As long as the Treaty is not reformed to fully apply articles 5, 6 and 9, we will continue to create our own multilateral system for exchange between peasants. We are calling on governments to support out movement, based on the principles of food sovereignty.

SIGNATORIES, FARMERS AND GARDENERS ORGANIZATIONS - September 25th, 2015.

1. African Centre for Biodiversity, Afrique du Sud et Tanzanie
2. AJAC LUKAAL, l'Association des Jeunes Agriculteurs de Casamance "Plantons", Sénégal
3. ANAFAE, Asociación Nacional de Fomento a la Agricultura Ecológica, Honduras
4. ANAMURI, Asociación Nacional l de Mujeres Rurales e Indígenas, Chili
5. ANMI, Asamblea Nacional de Mapuches de Izquierda, Chili
6. Association des Producteurs de Semences Paysannes, Sénégal
7. BEDE ( Biodiversité : Echanges et Diffusion d'Expériences ), France
8. Bio Burkina Faso, Burkina Faso.
9. Biowatch South Africa.
10. Campaña Semillas de Identidad, Colombie.
11. CCPA, Cadre de Concertation des Producteurs d'Arachides du Sénégal.
12. COASP, Comité ouest africain des Semences Paysannes et l’ensemble de ses membres.
13. Commons for EcoJustice, Malawi
14. CONAPROCH, Confederación Nacional  de Pequeños Productores, Chili
15. CENESTA,Centre for Sustainable Development and Environment, Iran
16. Confédération Paysanne, France
17. COPACO-PRP, Confédération Paysanne du Congo, République Démocratique du Congo
18. Copagen, Coalition Ouest Africaine pour les Semences paysannes, Sénégal  
19. Crocevia, Italie
20. ECVC, Coordination européenne Via Campesina
21. Fahamu Africa et le mouvement des femmes “ Nous sommes la solution”,  Afrique de l’Ouest
22. Farmworker Association of Florida, USA.
23. Ferme école Agroécologique Benkadibugu, Mali
24. FOOL AVOINE, pour une biodiversité sans OGM ni brevet, France
25. GIPA (Groupement Inter villageois des Producteurs d'Arachides des Communes de Thiomby/Gandiaye), membre CCPA, Sénégal
26. Grupo Semillas, Colombie
27. Landworkers' Alliance , Royaume-Uni
28. MAELA, Mouvement agroécologique de l'Amérique latine et les Caraïbes
29. MABD, Mouvement de l’Agriculture Biodynamique, France
30. MPA, Movimento dos pequenos agricultores, Brésil
31. Ranquil, Confederación Nacional Campesina  y de Pueblos originarios, Chili
32. Red de Semillas Campesinas, Argentina
33. Rede de Agrobiodiversidade do Semiárido Mineiro, Brésil
34. Redes de semillas campesinas (RSC), Columbia
35. Red de Semillas Libres, Colombia
36. Red de Semillas "Resembrando e Intercambiando", Espagne
37. RESACIFROAT, Réseau d'Appui à la Citoyenneté des Femmes Rurales d'Afrique de l'Ouest et du Tchad
38. Réseau Semences Paysannes (RSP), France
39. Rete Semi Rurali, Italie
40. Stop OGM Pacifique, Nouvelle Calédonie
41. Union Paysanne, Canada. 
42. Zimbabwe Smallholder Organic Farmers Forum, Zimbabwe.
43. La Via Campesina 

SUPPORTS

1. AHCC, Alianza Hondureña de Cambio Climático, Honduras
2. Alkhalachofa, grupo de consumo responsable, Alcala de Henares, Espagne
3. Australian Food Sovereignty, Australie
4. Burkinature, Burkina Faso
5. CEHPRODEC, Centro Hondureño de Promoción al Desarrollo Comunitario, Honduras
6. Chile Sustentable, Chili
7. Community Alliance for Global Justice, Seattle WA USA
8. CONROA, Coalición nacional de Redes y organizaciones Ambientales, Honduras
9. Doman chalosse vivante, France.
10. Enda Pronat, Sénégal
11. FIAN,  Colombie
12. Foro Ambiental Santiagueño, Argentine
13. IRPAD/Afrique, Institut de Recherche et de Promotion des Alternatives en Développement,  siège Mali.
14. JINUKUN : Réseau national pour une gestion durable des ressources génétiques , Point focal de la COPAGEN, Bénin
15. Laura Gutiérrez Escobar, Red de Semillas Libres de Colombia et FIAN, Colombie
16. MADGE, Australia
17. Myriam del Carmen Salazar Villarreal Doctora en Agroecología,  Colombie
18. Terra Nuova ONLUS, Italie
19. Vía Orgánica, Mexique

(see updated list of signatories here)

To sign or support the appeal, please send us back the name of your organization:

Mauro Conti, IPC (International Planning Committee for Food Sovereignty): ipc-cip@foodsovereignty.org

Émilie Lapprand, French Farmers' seeds network (Réseau Semences Paysannes) : emilie@semencespaysannes.org