Let the People Rebuild New Orleans
07/09/2005
- Opinión
On September 4, six days after Katrina hit, I saw the first glimmer of hope.
"The people of New Orleans will not go quietly into the night, scattering
across this country to become homeless in countless other cities while
federal relief funds are funneled into rebuilding casinos, hotels, chemical
plants.... We will not stand idly by while this disaster is used as an
opportunity to replace our homes with newly built mansions and condos in a
gentrified New Orleans."
The statement came from Community Labor United, a coalition of low-income
groups in New Orleans. It went on to demand that a committee made up of
evacuees "oversee FEMA, the Red Cross and other organizations collecting
resources on behalf of our people.... We are calling for evacuees from our
community to actively participate in the rebuilding of New Orleans."
It's a radical concept: The $10.5 billion released by Congress and the $500
million raised by private charities doesn't actually belong to the relief
agencies or the government; it belongs to the victims. The agencies
entrusted with the money should be accountable to them. Put another way,
the people Barbara Bush tactfully described as "underprivileged anyway"
just got very rich.
Except relief and reconstruction never seem to work like that. When I was
in Sri Lanka six months after the tsunami, many survivors told me that the
reconstruction was victimizing them all over again. A council of the
country's most prominent businesspeople had been put in charge of the
process, and they were handing the coast over to tourist developers at a
frantic pace. Meanwhile, hundreds of thousands of poor fishing people were
still stuck in sweltering inland camps, patrolled by soldiers with machine
guns and entirely dependent on relief agencies for food and water. They
called reconstruction "the second tsunami."
There are already signs that New Orleans evacuees could face a similarly
brutal second storm. Jimmy Reiss, chairman of the New Orleans Business
Council, told Newsweek that he has been brainstorming about how "to use
this catastrophe as a once-in-an-eon opportunity to change the dynamic."
The Business Council's wish list is well-known: low wages, low taxes, more
luxury condos and hotels. Before the flood, this highly profitable vision
was already displacing thousands of poor African-Americans: While their
music and culture was for sale in an increasingly corporatized French
Quarter (where only 4.3 percent of residents are black), their housing
developments were being torn down. "For white tourists and businesspeople,
New Orleans' reputation is 'a great place to have a vacation but don't
leave the French Quarter or you'll get shot,'" Jordan Flaherty, a New
Orleans-based labor organizer told me the day after he left the city by
boat. "Now the developers have their big chance to disperse the obstacle to
gentrification--poor people."
Here's a better idea: New Orleans could be reconstructed by and for the
very people most victimized by the flood. Schools and hospitals that were
falling apart before could finally have adequate resources; the rebuilding
could create thousands of local jobs and provide massive skills training in
decent paying industries. Rather than handing over the reconstruction to
the same corrupt elite that failed the city so spectacularly, the effort
could be led by groups like Douglass Community Coalition. Before the
hurricane this remarkable assembly of parents, teachers, students and
artists was trying to reconstruct the city from the ravages of poverty by
transforming Frederick Douglass Senior High School into a model of
community learning. They have already done the painstaking work of building
consensus around education reform. Now that the funds are flowing,
shouldn't they have the tools to rebuild every ailing public school in the
city?
For a people's reconstruction process to become a reality (and to keep more
contracts from going to Halliburton), the evacuees must be at the center of
all decision-making. According to Curtis Muhammad of Community Labor United,
the disaster's starkest lesson is that African-Americans cannot count on
any level of government to protect them. "We had no caretakers," he says.
That means the community groups that do represent African-Americans in
Louisiana and Mississippi -- many of which lost staff, office space and
equipment in the flood -- need our support now. Only a massive injection of
cash and volunteers will enable them to do the crucial work of organizing
evacuees -- currently scattered through forty-one states--into a powerful
political constituency. The most pressing question is where evacuees will
live over the next few months. A dangerous consensus is building that they
should collect a little charity, apply for a job at the Houston Wal-Mart
and move on. Muhammad and CLU, however, are calling for the right to return:
they know that if evacuees are going to have houses and schools to come
back to, many will need to return to their home states and fight for them.
These ideas are not without precedent. When Mexico City was struck by a
devastating earthquake in 1985, the state also failed the people: poorly
constructed public housing crumbled and the army was ready to bulldoze
buildings with survivors still trapped inside. A month after the quake
40,000 angry refugees marched on the government, refusing to be relocated
out of their neighborhoods and demanding a "Democratic Reconstruction." Not
only were 50,000 new dwellings for the homeless built in a year; the
neighborhood groups that grew out of the rubble launched a movement that is
challenging Mexico's traditional power holders to this day.
And the people I met in Sri Lanka have grown tired of waiting for the
promised relief. Some survivors are now calling for a People's Planning
Commission for Post-Tsunami Recovery. They say the relief agencies should
answer to them; it's their money, after all.
The idea could take hold in the United States, and it must. Because there
is only one thing that can compensate the victims of this most human of
natural disasters, and that is what has been denied them throughout: power.
It will be a long and difficult battle, but New Orleans' evacuees should
draw strength from the knowledge that they are no longer poor people; they
are rich people who have been temporarily locked out of their bank accounts.
Those wanting to donate to a people's reconstruction can make checks out to
the Vanguard Public Foundation, 383 Rhode Island St., Suite 301, San
Francisco, CA 94103. Checks should be earmarked "People's Hurricane Fund."
Source: The Nation
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20050926/klein
https://www.alainet.org/de/node/112925?language=en
Del mismo autor
- Uma semana contra o Capitalismo de Desastre 17/09/2019
- A promessa de um New Deal ambientalista para mudar os EUA 03/01/2019
- The Game-Changing Promise of a Green New Deal 03/01/2019
- A saída de Trump do acordo de Paris vai colocar o mundo em chamas? 02/06/2017
- O gabinete dos amiguinhos de Trump parece forte, mas tem medo 14/02/2017
- Prepare-se para o capitalismo do desastre de Trump 27/01/2017
- Get ready for the first shocks of Trump’s disaster capitalism 27/01/2017
- Por que proibiram as manifestações durante a Conferência do Clima de Paris? 26/11/2015
- Lo que está en juego en la Conferencia sobre Cambio Climático de París ahora que se han prohibido las manifestaciones 23/11/2015
- Laudato si': a defesa de um clima mais estável e uma economia mais justa 03/07/2015